rTMS Response Trajectories in Depression
Notwithstanding the cumulative evidence on the safety and efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression care, the non-response rate to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) amongst treatment-resistant depression has remained substantial despite the health care cost and time incurred. There remains a compelling clinical need to find valid biomarkers to inform personalized treatment. Using supervised machine learning on 4 combined features of neuroimaging markers, our group recently reported…
Conditions studied
Depression
About this study
Notwithstanding the cumulative evidence on the safety and efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression care, the non-response rate to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) amongst treatment-resistant depression has remained substantial despite the health care cost and time incurred. There remains a compelling clinical need to find valid biomarkers to inform personalized treatment. Using supervised machine learning on 4 combined features of neuroimaging markers, our group recently reported excellent prediction for clinical response in 70 patients receiving TMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for medication-resistant major depression in 2015-18 (Phase 1 study).The clinical utility of these potential neuroimaging biomarkers is still uncertain without further validation of the trained model in an independent clinical cohort.
Interventions
- Device: rTMS group
Primary outcomes
- Montgomery-Ashberg Depression Rating Scale (Percentage change baseline versus week 4)
- Montgomery-Ashberg Depression Rating Scale (Percentage change baseline versus week 6)
- Montgomery-Ashberg Depression Rating Scale (Percentage change baseline versus week 8)
- Montgomery-Ashberg Depression Rating Scale (Percentage change baseline versus week 12)
Eligibility information
Study locations
- Department of Psychiatry, CUHK, Hong Kong, 852 Hong Kong
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov. Record last refreshed by Varda Clinical: 2026-09-27.