Recruiting

Stent Implantation Versus Medical Therapy for Idiopathic IntracraniaL Hypertension (SIMPLE)

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of stent implantation versus medical therapy on idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis.

ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT05707442
PhasePHASE3
Enrollment74
SponsorBeijing Tiantan Hospital
Age18 Years
SexALL
I'm interested View official listing

Conditions studied

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypotension, Venous Sinus Stenosis

About this study

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of stent implantation versus medical therapy on idiopathic intracranial hypertension with venous sinus stenosis.

Interventions

Primary outcomes

Eligibility information

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject Eligibility Criteria 1. Diagnosis of IIH by modified Dandy criteria about for more than 2 months 2. Lumbar puncture opening pressure ≥250 mmH₂O within 6 weeks before enrollment 3. Normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) composition 4. Neuroimaging showing normal brain parenchyma without hydrocephalus, mass, or any structural lesion and no evidence of meningeal enhancement on CT or MRI 5. Localized venous sinus stenosis (VSS) with stenotic degree ≥ 50% on DSA, and pressure gradient across stenosis ≥ 8 mmHg 6. Patients or their relatives signed written informed consent * Ophthalmic Eligibility Criteria: 1. At least one eye had the presence of papilledema 2. At least one eye of visual field loss: PMD ranging from - 2dB and below; decreased visual function on automated perimetry was reproducible with a false-positive rate of no more than 15% 3. Visual acuity above 20 / 200 (≥ 39 letters) Exclusion Criteria: * Subject Exclusion Criteria 1. Previous surgery for IIH, including optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF), CSF shunting, decompressive craniectomy or venous sinus stenting 2. Progressive or rapid visual loss needed urgent surgical intervention; if delay\>24-48 h consider interim lumbar drain (for rapid visual loss only).Surgical options to consider: CSF diversion or optic nerve sheath fenestration 3. Visual loss due to other etiologies (eg, retinal drusen, retinal and optic neuropathy, cataracts, etc) 4. Other condition requiring the use of diuretics, steroids or other drugs to reduce intracranial pressure 5. DSA showed diffused venous sinus stenosis, cortical or deep vein stenosis 6. A history of severe thyroid disease and iodine allergy 7. Pregnant or lactating women 8. Severe cardiopulmonary, liver or kidney failure 9. Known hereditary or acquired haemorrhagic diathesis 10. Known hereditary or acquired thrombophilia 11. Platelet counts or coagulation abnormality 12. Major surgery or severe trauma or any traumatic brain injury within the previous 14 days 13. A history of cerebral hemorrhage, arteriovenous malformation, intracranial aneurysm or tumor 14. Other life threatening illness (eg, advanced cancer) likely to lead to death within a few months; the physical, psychological and social status of patients may affect follow-up (eg, drug addiction, advanced malignant disease, no telephone, no family, etc); cannot tolerate general anesthesia 15. Increased intracranial pressure due to other secondary factors * Ophthalmic Exclusion Criteria: 1. Current intraocular pressure \> 28mmHg or previous intraocular pressure \> 30mmHg 2. Refractive error spherical power greater than -6.0D or +6.0D and astigmatism greater than 3.0D, except for the following cases: 1. Myopia of - 6.0D to - 8.0D with the following: 1)There was no myopia related disease that can lead to decreased vision under the eyeground microscope (eg, scleral staphyloma, retinal thinning at the posterior pole, and moderate to severe disc tilt); 2) The patient wore contact lenses of appropriate degree for all visual field examinations. 2. Hyperopia of +6.0D to +8.0D with the following: 1) The presence of a well characterized peri optic disc edematous halo, as opposed to crowded small optic discs or other features of decreased visual acuity associated with hyperopic changes, was at the discretion of the site investigator or reading center leader (or his designee); 2) The patient wore contact lenses of appropriate degree for all visual field examinations. 3. Examination visible or past medical history known to have large optic disc drusen (persistent optic disc edema can present with small optic disc drusen, as low numbers are acceptable for inclusion and to be determined by the investigator to be unrelated to vision loss)

Study locations

Before you participate: Varda Clinical is an independent discovery tool, not the study sponsor or a medical provider. Eligibility can only be determined by the official study team. Discuss potential risks and benefits with a qualified healthcare professional.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov. Record last refreshed by Varda Clinical: 2026-09-27.