Recruiting

Comparison of the Safety and Aesthetic Outcomes of a Novel Endoscopic-Assisted Breast-Conserving Surgery (SRRSHzb-EABCS) With Those of Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery

This multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled study compares a novel endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery technique (SRRSHzb-EABCS) with conventional open breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) in women with breast cancer who wish to preserve their breast. Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is a standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Conventional open surgery leaves visible scars on the breast, while traditional endoscopy-assisted techniques are time-consuming…

I'm interested View official listing
ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT07920094
PhaseNA
Enrollment422
SponsorSir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Age18 Years – 70 Years
SexFEMALE
I'm interested View official listing

Conditions studied

Breast Cancer

About this study

This multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized controlled study compares a novel endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery technique (SRRSHzb-EABCS) with conventional open breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) in women with breast cancer who wish to preserve their breast. Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is a standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Conventional open surgery leaves visible scars on the breast, while traditional endoscopy-assisted techniques are time-consuming, difficult to learn, and costly. The investigators developed a novel technique, SRRSHzb-EABCS, which uses a gasless expansion-traction endoscopic system with a custom-built skin flap dissector and V-shaped retractor, together with percutaneous U-shaped metal wires placed around the marked tumor margin, enabling precise tumor localization and margin control through a single axillary incision. The technique is designed to be easier to learn, shorter in operative time, less expensive, and more cosmetic. Eligible participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either SRRSHzb-EABCS or conventional open breast-conserving surgery. The main goal of the study is to compare the intraoperative and postoperative positive margin rates between the two techniques. The study also compares aesthetic outcomes measured by BREAST-Q scores at 1 and 18 months after surgery, complication rates, and 5-year local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. A total of 422 participants (211 per arm) will be enrolled at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and multiple participating centers in China. Participants are followed at 1 month and 18 months after surgery, with long-term follow-up for up to 5 years.

Interventions

Primary outcomes

Eligibility information

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Female; 2. Aged 18-70 years; 3. Preoperative pathologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer, treated at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (lead center) or other participating centers; 4. Voluntary participation in the study with signed informed consent; 5. Desire for breast conservation; 6. Clinical stage I-II early breast cancer: tumor size T1-T2, with adequate breast volume and an appropriate tumor-to-breast volume ratio, such that a satisfactory breast shape can be maintained after surgery; 7. Selected patients with clinical stage III disease (except inflammatory breast cancer) who meet the criteria for breast-conserving surgery after downstaging by preoperative therapy may be carefully considered; 8. Signed informed consent and willingness to receive standard postoperative adjuvant therapy and long-term follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating women; 2. History of radiotherapy to the ipsilateral chest wall; 3. Severe dysfunction of major organs, such as heart or lung; 4. History of other malignant tumors; 5. Extensive lesions for which negative margins or a satisfactory cosmetic outcome cannot be achieved; 6. Diffusely distributed malignant-appearing calcifications; 7. Multifocal or multicentric lesions; 8. Positive dimple sign; 9. Preoperative imaging indicating invasion of the skin or pectoralis major; 10. Refusal to enter the randomization process; 11. Vulnerable populations, including persons with mental illness, cognitive impairment, critically ill patients, minors, pregnant women, and illiterate persons.

Study locations

Showing 10 of 22 reported sites. See the official listing for all locations.

Before you participate: Varda Clinical is an independent discovery tool, not the study sponsor or a medical provider. Eligibility can only be determined by the official study team. Discuss potential risks and benefits with a qualified healthcare professional.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov. Record last refreshed by Varda Clinical: 2026-11-09.