Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Phase: NA
Status: Active, positions filled
Start Date: 2021-09-01
Completion: 2028-06-30
Search thousands of clinical trials by condition, location, and eligibility criteria
Diabetes is a disorder of high blood glucose, that tends to get worse; over time, patients need more and more drugs. This pattern is caused by overwork of the body's insulin-producing β-cells, because patients' glucose levels are typically above normal; if the investigators kept glucose levels normal - reducing β-cell work - the investigators might be able to keep the disease from getting worse. This trial is aimed to show that adjusting the drugs to keep glucose levels normal, can help to preserve β-cell function compared to usual diabetes care, possibly reduce the tendency to develop the eye and kidney complications of diabetes, and might also be more cost-effective than usual care.
This is a single-site, open-label, Phase II, community-based randomized controlled explanatory trial to test the efficacy of a medically tailored meal + intensive lifestyle intervention (MTM + ILI) intervention for adults with food insecurity, HIV, and T2DM or high risk of T2DM, compared with a group that receives usual MTM.
This study tests whether an artificial intelligence (AI) tool can help doctors choose better diabetes medicines for their patients. Type 2 diabetes is very common, but there are far more patients than diabetes specialists, so many patients are treated by doctors who are not diabetes specialists. The researchers built an AI consultation system that gives doctors real-time suggestions and predictions about diabetes medicines while they are prescribing. The doctor always makes the final decision. In this trial, patients with type 2 diabetes whose blood sugar is not well controlled will be placed by chance (randomly) into one of two groups. In one group, the doctor uses the AI system when deciding on diabetes medicines. In the other group, the doctor prescribes as usual, without the AI system. All medicines used are already approved in Taiwan and given at approved doses. The study follows each patient for 12 months, with check-ups at the start and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The main goal is to compare how much the patients' long-term blood sugar level (HbA1c) improves between the two groups after one year. The researchers also look at how many patients reach their blood sugar target, how often low blood sugar happens, and whether any side effects occur. The aim is to find out whether using the AI tool leads to better blood sugar control.
People with type 2 diabetes are at risk of complications linked with high blood sugars and these are monitored for in healthcare appointments. However, people with type 2 diabetes commonly suffer with additional health conditions that can affect the liver, heart and their breathing while sleeping. These conditions are thought to be caused by a similar underlying process that causes type 2 diabetes, as a result they are very common in people type 2 diabetes. Despite this they are not part of the routine health check for these people. Worryingly, current research suggests that the risk for developing these health problems, and direct complications of type 2 diabetes, can start at blood sugar levels below the threshold of type 2 diabetes. In a group of people said to have prediabetes. These people do not currently undergo annual healthcare appointments to monitor for these health complications or other linked health conditions. This study aims to pilot a new style of clinic to address these issues. The investigators will perform a multi-morbidity assessment, where they will look for several different health problems at the same time. The investigators will be looking at health problems linked with high blood sugars, this will include problems with the liver, heart, nerves, eyes, and participants breathing overnight. They have developed a clinic visit which uses questionnaires, simple examination techniques and modern devices to try and identify these health problems. An important part of healthcare is the burden it places on people with health problems, with this in mind the investigators will be giving the people involved in their study a voice to try and direct future research and healthcare, the investigators will ask them to provide feedback on their experience in taking part in the study and what their thoughts are in undergoing a longer but more comprehensive health appointment.
Diabetes-related distress is a psychological construct associated with poorer glycaemic control in people living with diabetes. In France, few data are available on this topic and none focus specifically on adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes-related distress is not mentioned in the current French national guidelines on the management of type 2 diabetes, whereas international societies such as the ADA and, more recently, the EASD now recommend its regular assessment. This single-centre observational study conducted in the endocrinology department of Nice University Hospital aims to estimate the prevalence of severe diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving usual care, and to identify associated clinical, psychosocial and lifestyle factors. Participants complete validated self-report questionnaires (PAID-20 for diabetes distress, WHOQOL-BREF for quality of life, and a modified Starting The Conversation dietary questionnaire), and clinical data are extracted from electronic medical records. The study does not modify usual medical management and participation consists only in completing the questionnaires and receiving feedback on the results.
The trial is an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients with T2D on insulin therapy will be randomized to an intelligent telemonitoring group (intervention), a telemonitoring group (control), and a usual care group (control). Both the intelligent telemonitoring group and the telemonitoring group will use various devices at home. Hospital staff will monitor their data for three months. In the intelligent telemonitoring group, hospital staff and participants will be supported by decision-support algorithms in the management of insulin treatment.
Glucose monitoring is an important part of self-management for patients with diabetes. The results of glucose monitoring not only help to assess the degree of glucose metabolism disorders in patients, but also help physicians to make clinical decisions and guide patients in self-management. Despite extensive efforts and advances in diabetes management during hospitalization, glucose control after patients is discharged home remains a challenge. This trial aims to explore the effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) system compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) group on glucose and self-efficacy of type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin after discharge from the hospital.
This pilot 12-week randomized open-label study compares metformin and berberine in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients stratified by the TCF7L2 (rs7903146) genotype (TT vs. CC). The primary goal is to assess changes in HbA1c between metformin and berberine treated groups within each genotype. Secondary outcomes include fasting and postprandial glucose, insulin levels, HOMA-IR, body weight/BMI, lipid profile and adverse events. The central hypothesis is that berberine, through its additional effect on TCF7L2-linked pathways, will provide superior glycemic control in high-risk TT carriers compared to metformin, whereas both treatments will yield comparable results in CC carriers. By enrolling only TT and CC genotypes, this study aims to estimate effect sizes and feasibility, guiding a future, larger-scale trial on genotype-tailored diabetes therapies.
This study is a multicenter, randomized, open, parallel-controlled, Phase III clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of semaglutide injection and Ozempic® in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The GLITTER Study 2 is a cluster randomized trial that will evaluate the impact of comprehensive and intensive management, comprising a team, technology, education, and peer resources, on metabolic control and psychological outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes.
The aim of this interventional study is to investigate the effect of whole body vibration therapy on muscle oxygenation, vibration sensation, functional capacity and balance in individuals with Type 2 diabetes. The main questions aimed to be answered are: * Does whole body vibration therapy affect peripheral muscle oxygenation? * Does whole body vibration therapy improve vibration sense, functional capacity and balance compared to aerobic exercise? Participants' muscle oxygenation, vibration sensation, functional capacity and balance parameters will be assessed. They will participate in a whole body vibration therapy or aerobic training program.
The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of short-term forearm immobilization on forearm muscle glucose uptake and amino acid net balance and kinetics in individuals with T2D compared with a control group with normoglycaemia.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate tirzepatide within a real-world setting to assess body weight loss and incidence of type 2 diabetes in adults without diabetes who have obesity and at least one weight-related comorbid condition. Eligible participants must be registered patients at a participating site. Participation in the study will last about 260 weeks.
This is a multicentre, prospective, observational study of the medicine tirzepatide as it is used in routine clinical care in Pakistan. Tirzepatide is already approved for type 2 diabetes and for obesity, but there is very little information on how it works for people in South Asia, and none from Pakistan specifically. This study aims to fill that gap. The study will follow 330 adults who are starting tirzepatide as part of their normal treatment, across ten diabetes and endocrinology centres in Pakistan. Everyone taking part has obesity, and they are grouped into three cohorts based on their blood sugar status at the start: obesity without diabetes, prediabetes with obesity, and type 2 diabetes with obesity. The study does not change anyone's treatment. The treating doctor decides whether to prescribe tirzepatide, at what dose, and for how long. The study simply observes and records what happens over 24 weeks, with assessments at the start, at Weeks 12 to 14, and at Weeks 24 to 26. The main things measured are the change in blood sugar control (HbA1c) in the diabetes cohort, and the change in body weight in the obesity and prediabetes cohorts. The study also looks at changes in blood pressure, cholesterol, and other measures, how well people stay on treatment, any side effects, and how participants feel about their treatment and quality of life. The findings will help doctors understand how tirzepatide performs in real-world care in Pakistan and inform its use in similar populations.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to assess feasibility of an intervention to deliver comprehensive, high-quality diabetes care through telemedicine among adults with type 2 diabetes who use insulin and have multiple chronic health conditions. The main question it aims to answer is: Is an enhanced telemedicine intervention for type 2 diabetes compared to usual telemedicine care feasible? Researchers will compare the enhanced telemedicine intervention to usual telemedicine care to see if there are differences in patient satisfaction or preliminary clinical outcomes. Participants will complete 2-3 telemedicine diabetes care visits over approximately 6 months, as well as complete survey measures with each diabetes care visit. Patients in the intervention group will also receive additional support, including pre-visit preparation phone calls, diabetes self-management education and support aligned with their visits, and post-visit follow-up calls.
Asthma is a chronic (long-term) condition that affects the airways in the lungs. The airways are tubes that carry air in and out of your lungs. In asthma the airways can become inflamed and narrowed at times. This makes it harder for air to flow out of your airways when you breathe out. When symptoms get worse, it is called an asthma attack. There is no permeant cure for asthma, but medical treatment and physiotherapy treatment can help to manage it. There is many physiotherapy protocols can be used for asthma patients like aerobic exercises, breathing exercise etc. The objective of our study is determine the combine effects of inspiratory muscle training with Pilate training on dyspnea, cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in asthma patients. The randomized control trial will used as study design as study design for this this purpose simple random sampling technique will be used to allocate the sample in two group The sample size will be calculated by the G-power analysis. This study will conduct in Jinnah Hospital, Lahore Group A will receive both inspiratory training and Pilate training and group B receive only Inspiratory training, incentive spirometer the participants were instructed to hold the breath for 2-3 seconds then exhale slowly. This process was repeated 10 times or about 10-15minutes with rest in between 30 seconds. Base line treatment is diaphragmatic breathing exercise .The session will repeated three times per week for 6 weeks with 40-minute sessions In Pilates we include 5 Pilate exercise, The Hundred (Rhythmic Breathing), Single Leg Stretch (Rhythmic Breathing), side kick, Toe Taps (Set Breathing Pattern) ,leg pull front. Pre and post measurement will be done using Juniper asthma quality of life, 6 mint walk test, Borges dyspnea scale and fatigue severity scale to measure the outcomes. Data will be analyzed SPSS version 25. T-test and Regression analysis will be used. Key words: asthma patient, cardiorespiratory fitness, dyspnea, quality of life, Pilate training, inspiratory muscle training
To assess the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in pediatric participants with severe uncontrolled asthma on medium to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and at least one additional asthma controller medication with or without oral corticosteroids.
Eliminating inappropriate antibiotic use in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is the central focus of this research. LRTIs (pneumonia, bronchiolitis, and infection-related exacerbations of asthma) account for nearly one-third of all emergency department (ED) visits and 40% of all infection-related hospitalizations in US children. LRTIs also account for more antibiotic use in children's hospitals than any other condition, despite most LRTIs being viral in nature. Inappropriate antibiotics are associated with substantial adverse effects. Accordingly, national guidelines strongly discourage routine antibiotic use for bronchiolitis and acute asthma and argue for significantly reducing antibiotic exposure (initiation, spectrum, and duration) in pneumonia. To address the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use, hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are now common nationwide, and these programs have demonstrated effectiveness in some hospital settings. Unfortunately, traditional ASP approaches do not translate well to the fast-paced and unpredictable ED environment, and hospital-based ASP resources are finite and not always immediately available. Clinical decision support (CDS) embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) is a strategy that could address the ED antibiotic stewardship gap. Informed by a deep understanding of the key facilitators and barriers to using CDS to support appropriate antibiotic use in ED and hospital settings, the investigators have developed two stewardship-focused CDS interventions for pediatric LRTI. The overarching goal of this research is to rigorously evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these CDS tools, alone and in combination, against usual care only in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial at 3 U.S. children's hospitals.
Complementary and adjunctive therapies are increasingly being explored to enhance asthma control and reduce airway inflammation. Nigella sativa (black seed) is a medicinal plant used traditionally in multiple regions and has demonstrated anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and bronchodilator effects. Its potential as an adjuvant therapy in asthma has attracted attention in both preclinical and clinical research
ELBRUS is a 12-month (52-week), multi-centre, prospective, non-comparative and non-interventional (observational), post-reimbursement real-world evidence study that will assess patient-reported outcomes after tezepelumab treatment initiation in participants with severe asthma in Russia.