Search thousands of clinical trials by condition, location, and eligibility criteria
This study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of GDC-9545 as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib and/or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist in participants with advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 \[HER2\]-negative) breast cancer.
The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the study drug sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) given at an alternative dose and schedule, in participants with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The primary objectives of this study are to assess the safety and tolerability of SG given at alternate dose and schedule, to assess the effect on objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SKB264 combined with KL-A167 as neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage high-risk ER+HER2- breast cancer patients.
This is a multicenter, open-label FIH, Phase 1a (dose escalation), Phase 1b (dose expansion) and Phase 2 study in patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard treatment.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and tolerability of Cirtuvivint in combination with Olaparib in platinum resistant ovarian cancer. The study also aims to determine the recommended dose of the combination therapy. If a participant is a good fit for the study, and they enroll in the study, they will: * Visit the clinic often at the beginning of the study for physical exams, blood draws, vital signs, and other study and routine care procedures. After the first two months participants will visit the clinic every 28 days. * Take the study medications, Cirtuvivint and Olaparib. Participants will take Olaparib every day. Participants will either take Cirtuvivint 5 days per week or 2 days per week.
This is a multi-site clinical study enrolling 2000 newly diagnosed patients with breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or non-small cell lung cancer, who are planning to receive one or more systemic cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy and/or (immune checkpoint inhibitors) ICIs.
This trial studies how well paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab work in eliminating further chemotherapy after surgery in patients with HER2-positive stage II-IIIa breast cancer who have no cancer remaining at surgery (either in the breast or underarm lymph nodes) after pre-operative chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are both a form of "targeted therapy" because they work by attaching themselves to specific molecules (receptors) on the surface of tumor cells, known as HER2 receptors. When these drugs attach to HER2 receptors, the signals that tell the cells to grow are blocked and the tumor cell may be marked for destruction by the body's immune system. Giving paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab may enable fewer chemotherapy drugs to be given without compromising patient outcomes compared to the usual treatment.
This study is a prospective, exploratory clinical study design, and plans to enroll 33 patients with HR+HER2 low expression breast cancer who received pyrotinib combined with darcili and standard endocrine neoadjuvant therapy to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in HR+HER2 low expression breast cancer. Imaging evaluation was performed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and tumor imaging evaluation was performed by the participating center. The pathological evaluation after surgery of neoadjuvant patients was the pCR assessed by the pathologist of the participating center.
The purpose of this study to test whether a comprehensive program may help the lymph fluid to drain out of the arm and prevent lymphedema in participants with breast cancer.
The EXActDNA-003 study will prospectively enroll participants who are planning to undergo chemotherapy for high-risk, early breast cancer, who are willing to provide tissue and blood specimens for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. Participants will be followed for up to 5.5 years.
A breast reconstruction after mastectomy, either due to breast cancer or a high lifetime risk for cancer, is performed to increase the patient's quality of life. However, there are studies that show that some women regret their decision to have breast reconstruction. There are also studies demonstrating similarities in the general patterns of psychosocial adjustment and quality of life among women with breast cancer who have undergone breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, and mastectomy combined with breast reconstruction. Hence, it is unclear which women actually benefit from a breast reconstruction. The concept of quality of life is connected to patient satisfaction and body image/investment. Therefore, the aim of this project is to examine the effects of patient expectations and body image on the patient reported outcomes of breast reconstruction, to improve preoperative information and postoperative care for women considering a breast reconstruction.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer who have received prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on the extended therapeutic indication of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu®), a new patient population will be enrolled, comprising adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-low, or HER2-(ultra)low breast cancer who have received at least one endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting and are not considered suitable for endocrine therapy as the next line of treatment.
This study evaluates the safety of abemaciclib in combination therapies (letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, exemestane plus everolimus, trastuzumab, LY3023414 plus fulvestrant, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with loperamide, or ongoing endocrine therapy) for breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body.
Lymphedema is a chronic, progressive, and debilitating condition that occurs with disruption or obstruction of the lymphatic system, which commonly occurs a result of breast cancer therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a low risk lymphatic reconstruction procedure at the time of axillary lymph node dissection will reduce the risk of developing lymphedema. Additionally, to determine if this procedure improves objective outcomes of lymphedema and patient quality of life
This multicenter, prospective phase II clinical trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of sequential Trastuzumab rezetecan followed by dalpiciclib plus endocrine therapy (fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitors) in 45 patients with HR+/HER2-low/ultra-low advanced breast cancer. Enrolled patients will receive Trastuzumab rezetecan monotherapy for 6-8 cycles until clinical benefit, then transition to CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The study will be conducted at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and collaborating centers.
A phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ribociclib with Endocrine Therapy (ET) as an adjuvant treatment in women and men with Hormone Receptor positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 negative (HER2-) Early Breast Cancer (EBC).
To compare how often cancer recurs (comes back) after 3 weeks of radiation compared to 5 weeks of radiation in patients who receive radiation therapy delivered to the lymph nodes near the breast. The side effects that can develop during or after radiation treatment, including how often arm swelling (edema) happens, will also be studied.
Genetic testing can alter therapy and surgical management for cancer patients and is therefore indicated as a first-line test for many newly diagnosed patients, including breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and colon/GI patients. To reduce pressure on already constrained genetics clinics across Canada, some cancer centres are 'mainstreaming' genetic testing - whereby genetic testing is initiated and mediated by oncologists without traditional pre-test genetic counseling (GC) often using some form of paper-based patient pamphlets or videos. There is no standard, evidence-based approach to mainstreaming, leading to significant practice variation, a lack of coordinated care and ultimately, negative psychological impacts on patients. Digital solutions can address these gaps by providing a standardized, coordinated and patient-centered approach to deliver cancer genetic education. However, digital solutions for providing cancer genetics services are uncommon and clinical-effectiveness and service delivery outcomes have not been well-assessed. This study will test a digital mainstreaming platform called the Genetics Adviser for Mainstream care to assess its effectiveness in improving psychological outcomes and patient-centred care for mainstream cancer patients compared to standard of care.
18F-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) is an estrogen receptor-targeting positron emission tomography tracer with high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of estrogen receptor(ER)-positive tumors . 18F-FES has been used as a predictive biomarker to demonstrate estrogen receptor heterogeneity , to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of estrogen receptor-targeted drugs , to measure residual estrogen receptors during endocrine therapy and to determine biologically optimal doses of novel estrogen receptor-targeted drugs .This study aimes to explore the efficacy of 18F-FES PET/CT in evaluating the expression levels of ER in primary and metastatic breast cancer patients.
In the context of breast cancer, in case of an indication for chemotherapy, anthracycline-based protocols make it possible to improve the overall survival of patients most at risk. The frequency of anthracycline-related cardiac toxicities (ARCT) increases with the cumulative dose of anthracyclines administered and explains, at least in part, the increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patient populations treated for breast cancer. The numerous indications for anthracycline-based protocols have made it possible to describe ARCT, among which heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains one of the most comorbid. In addition to left ventricular dysfunction, anthracyclines have been associated with endothelial dysfunction, microvascular damage and myocardial ischemia responsible for dilated cardiomyopathy. Different approaches have attempted to better understand and prevent these ARCT. However, apart from the notion of limit cumulative doses of anthracyclines, few of them have made it possible to screen patients at risk and prevent the onset of cardiac dysfunction. The search for biological markers (Troponin I, BNP) or ultrasound markers (Longitudinal Strain) warning of subclinical cardiac damage is still struggling to assert its interest due in particular to significant inter- and intra-observer variability. Therapeutically, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have shown a significant improvement in the incidence rate of LVEF reduction during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, despite equivalent signals in other cancers, the studies conducted to date are insufficiently powered and the role of these treatments is limited to secondary prevention or the treatment of objective heart failure. It remains necessary to determine new biological markers that can identify patients most at risk of ARCT and thus adapt our therapeutic prevention strategies. To do this, it is first necessary to better understand the pathophysiology underlying these ARCT. The objective of this study is to determine whether expression of the receptor among endothelium and circulating cells, SGLT2, is associated with an additional risk of presenting cardiovascular toxicity following treatment with anthracycline. If this association is demonstrated, it will then be possible to better screen and prevent these cardiovascular complications.